Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences1028-88801812-5735Asian Network for Scientific Information10.3923/pjbs.2015.240.246OwaisSaed J. 52015185Salt contaminated areas are considered as, a critical problem in arid and semi-arid regions that limit the yield potential of agricultural crops. In the present study, NaCl salt stress susceptibility was assessed in five Jordanian grapes landraces (Salti, Zani, Red Glob, Darawishi and SoriBaladi) and B41 root stock using two levels of salt stress (6000 and 12000 ppm NaCl) in addition to the control during 2013 and 2014 growing season under controlled condition. Plant biomass (root and shoot), physiological parameters (relative water content and total chlorophyll content) and leaves mineral content were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in response to salt stress. High NaCl causes more pronounced reductions in these parameters than low NaCl treatment indicating the harmful effect of NaCl on plant biomass and physiological performance of the grape. Proline accumulated two and three time more under low and high salinity treatment than their respective control. The interactive effects of genotype and salt level treatment were significant (p<0.01) on plant biomass, mineral content and physiological parameter indicating, high level of variability exists among studied grape genotypes in response to salt stress. The lowest reductions in plant biomass and physiological parameters were recorded in Salti and Darawishi and consequently they could be considered as potential donors for genes for salt stress tolerance.]]>McEAlexander, D. and J.G. Obbink,197111357361Al-Saidi, I.,198015125135Antcliff, A.J., H.P. Newman and H.C. Barrett,198322357362Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare,197339205207Bybordi, A.,2012910921101Delauney, A.J. and D.P.S. Verma,19934215223Dettori, S.,1985171181186Divate, M.R. and R.M. Pandey,1981247479Dunn, A. and J. Arditti,1968Pages: 312Pages: 312FAO.,20142014Fisarakis, I., K. Chartzoulakis and D. Stavrakas,2001V. vinifera L.) on six rootstocks to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery.]]>511327Fischer, R.A. and R. Maurer,197829897912Flowers, T.J.,200455307319Flowers, T.J., A. Garcia, M. Koyama and A.R. Yeo,199719427433Gomez-del-Campo, M., C. Ruiz and J.R. Lissarrague,200253138143Gorham, J. and R.G. Wyn Jones,19931993pp: 27-33pp: 27-33Harborne, J.B.,19731st Edn.,Pages: 278Pages: 278Hawker, J.S. and R.R. Walker,197829172176Meri, A.,1984Munns, R.,200225239250Pessarakli, M.,19992nd EDn.,Pages: 1254Pages: 1254Walker, R.R., D.H. Blackmore, P.R. Clingeleffer, P. Godden, L. Francis, P. Valente and E. Robinson,200376200227, (In French)Shani, U. and A. Ben-Gal,200556148154Singh, S.K., H.C. Sharma, A.M. Goswami, S.P. Datta and S.P. Singh,2000In vitro growth and leaf composition of grapevine cultivars as affected by sodium chloride.]]>43283286Sivritepe, N., H.O. Sivritepe, H. Celik and A.V. Katkat,201038193201Troncoso de Arce, A., C. Matte, M. Cantos and S. Lavee,1999in vitro-grown grapevine rootstock varieties.]]>385560Walker, R.R., D.H. Blackmore, P.R. Clingeleffer and R.L. Correll,2004Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana) 2. Ion concentrations in leaves and juice.]]>109099Weatherley, P.E.,1950498197