K. J. Barker
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
J. L. Purswell
United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS) Poultry Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
J. D. Davis
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
H. M. Parker
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
M. T. Kidd
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
C. D. McDaniel
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
A. S. Kiess
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
ABSTRACT
A common practice in the commercial broiler industry is to reuse litter over multiple broiler flocks. Over time the bacterial populations in the reused litter increases but how those organisms are spatially distributed throughout the litter bed is unclear. Therefore, the goal of this project was to investigate the distribution of bacteria at three different depths of litter. Litter samples were collected from three commercial broiler houses on three different farms. Four samples from each house were collected using clear PVC pipes which were driven through the litter bed to the clay floor. Each pipe was transported up-right to the lab, where they were cut into three sections (top, middle and bottom) exposing the litter for processing. Litter from each section was serially diluted in peptone and streaked onto either tryptic soy agar or Levin eosin methylene blue agar plates. Plates were incubated under the appropriate atmospheric condition for 24 h at 37oC. After 24 h, plates were counted for total aerobes, anaerobes and coliforms. Results of this study indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) in bacterial counts between the different sections of the litter. The middle and bottom sections had significantly lower anaerobe and coliform counts compared to the bacterial counts in the top sections. In conclusion, the results suggest that the middle and bottom section of litter provide a less favorable environment for bacterial growth than the top section.
PDF References
How to cite this article
K. J. Barker, J. L. Purswell, J. D. Davis, H. M. Parker, M. T. Kidd, C. D. McDaniel and A. S. Kiess, 2010. Distribution of Bacteria at Different Poultry Litter Depths1. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 10-13.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.10.13
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.10.13
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.10.13
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.10.13
REFERENCES
- Fries, R., M. Akcan, N. Bandick and A. Kobe, 2005. Microflora of two different types of poultry litter. Br. Poult. Sci., 46: 668-672.
CrossRefDirect Link - Giambrone, J.J., O. Fagbohun and K.S. Macklin, 2008. Management practicesto reduce infectious laryngotracheitis virus in poultry litter. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 64-68.
CrossRefDirect Link - Jeffrey, J.S., J.H. Kirk, E.R. Atwill and J.S. Cullor, 1998. Prevalence of selected microbial pathogens in processed poultry waste used as dairy cattle feed. Poult. Sci., 77: 808-811.
Direct Link - Lovett, J., J.W. Messer and R.B. Read, 1971. The microflora of Southern Ohio poultry litter. Poult. Sci., 50: 746-751.
PubMedDirect Link - Lu, J., S. Sanchez, C. Hofacre, J.J. Maurer, B.G. Harmon and M.G. Lee, 2003. Evaluation of broiler litter with reference to the microbial composition as assessed by using 16S rRNA and functional gene markers. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 69: 901-908.
Direct Link - Macklin, K.S., J.B. Hess and S.F. Bilgili, 2008. In-house composting and its effects on foodborne pathogens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 121-127.
CrossRefDirect Link - Macklin, K.S., J.B. Hess, S.F. Bilgili and R.A. Norton, 2006. Effects of in-house composting of litter on bacteria levels. J. Applied Poult. Res., 15: 531-537.
Direct Link - Vizzier-Thaxton, Y., C.L. Balzli and J.D. Tankson, 2003. Relationship of broiler flock numbers to litter microflora. J. Applied Poult. Res., 12: 81-84.
Direct Link