K. E. Anderson
Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7608, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
P. K. Jenkins
Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7608, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
ABSTRACT
Step-Up Protein (SUP) rearing regimens can reduce Feed Consumption (FC) and Body Weight (BW), while still resulting in pullets with equal or superior egg production and egg mass to pullets grown on a Step-Down Protein (SDP) program. Egg weight has been reduced due to SUP programs, presumably due to the reduced BW at sexual maturity. Because BW is reduced by SUP regimens and a slight lowering of FC, BW and EW may be economically advantageous. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to evaluate the impact of SUP regimens on brown-egg layer rearing program on subsequent productivity and the effect of feeder space and density on performance. Two brown-egg strains, Hy-Line Brown (HB) and the H and N Brown Nick (BN) were grown on three different dietary regimens, i.e. a "normal" SDP regimen, a SUP regimen: low energy starter for 9 wk (SUP9) and a SUP regimen: low energy starter for 12 wk (SUP12). The SUP9 and SUP12 feeding regimens resulted in significantly lower BW and feed conversion and shorter sternum length, than the SDP regimen. Egg production was not significantly different among the 3 regimens, but feed conversion was lower while livability was highest in the SUP12 reared hens. Feeder space of 13.6 cm resulted in poorer feed conversion for the SUP12 reared hens. Density per hen of 482 cm2 resulted in significantly improved egg production characteristics, such as 37 more eggs per hen and an 8.1% improvement in flock livability. Only density affected egg income and feed costs and in both egg income and feed costs were higher in hens kept at 482 cm2 were $2.39 and $0.21, respectively. Rearing pullets did not result in a reduced economic return in the laying period, where providing hens a lower density environment increased the per hen income.
PDF References
How to cite this article
K. E. Anderson and P. K. Jenkins, 2011. Effect of Rearing Dietary Regimen, Feeder Space and Density on Egg Production, Quality and Size Distribution in Two Strains of Brown Egg Layers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10: 169-175.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2011.169.175
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2011.169.175
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2011.169.175
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2011.169.175
REFERENCES
- Adams, A.W. and J.V. Craig, 1985. Effects of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers: A survey. Poult. Sci., 64: 238-242.
CrossRef - Anderson, K.E., 2010. Effects of dietary regimens and brown-egg pullet strain on growth and development. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 205-211.
CrossRefDirect Link - Anderson, K.E., G.B. Havenstein and J. Brake, 1995. Effects of strain and rearing dietary regimens on brown-egg pullet growth and strain, rearing dietary regimens, density and feeder space effects on subsequent laying performance. Poult. Sci., 74: 1079-1092.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Bish, C.L., W.L. Beane, P.L. Ruszler and J.A. Cherry, 1984. Modified step-up protein feeding regimens for egg-type chickens. 1. Growth and production performance. Poult. Sci., 63: 2450-2457.
PubMedDirect Link - Cheng, T.K., A. Peguri, M.L. Hamre and C.N. Coon, 1991. Effect of rearing regimens on pullet growth and subsequent laying performance. Poult. Sci., 70: 907-916.
PubMedDirect Link - Christmas, R.B., C.R. Douglas, L.W. Kalch and R.H. Harms, 1982. The effects of low protein pullet growing diets on performance of laying hens housed in the fall. Poult. Sci., 61: 2103-2106.
PubMedDirect Link - Connor, J.K. and H.W. Burton, 1971. The performance of laying hens fed various dietary protein levels in the growing period and first laying year. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 11: 161-168.
Direct Link - Davami, A., M.J. Wineland, W.T. Jones, R.L. Ilardi and R.A. Peterson, 1987. Effects of population size, floor space and feeder space upon productive performance, external appearance and plasma corticosterone concentration of laying hens. Poult. Sci., 66: 251-257.
PubMed - Doran, B.H., W.F. Krueger and J.W. Bradley, 1983. Effect of step-down and step-up protein-energy feeding systems on egg-type pullet growth and laying performance. Poult. Sci., 62: 255-262.
PubMedDirect Link - Douglas, C.R., D.M. Welch and R.H. Harms, 1985. A step-down protein program for commercial pullets. Poult. Sci., 64: 1137-1142.
PubMedDirect Link - Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1978. Voluntary food restriction of laying hens mediated through dietary self-selection. Br. Poult. Sci., 19: 417-424.
Direct Link - Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1984. Effects of cage density and diet energy concentration on the performance of growing leghorn pullets subjected to early induced maturity. Poult. Sci., 63: 875-882.
PubMedDirect Link - Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1984. Influence of nutritional modification on skeletal size of leghorn and broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci., 63: 1222-1228.
Direct Link - Maurice, D.V., B.L. Hughes, J.E. Jones and J.M. Weber, 1982. The effect of reverse protein and low protein feeding regimens in the rearing period on pullet growth, subsequent performance and liver and abdominal fat at end of lay. Poult. Sci., 61: 2421-2429.
PubMed - Thogerson, C.M., P.Y. Hester, J.A. Mench, R.C. Newberry and C.M. Okura et al., 2009. The effect of feeder space allocation on productivity and physiology of Hy-Line W-36 hens housed in conventional cages. Poult. Sci., 88: 1793-1799.
Direct Link