D.L. Everett
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
Y. Vizzier-Thaxton
Center for Animal Wellbeing, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
C.D. McDaniel
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
A.S. Kiess
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
ABSTRACT
In addition to pine shavings, alternative litter sources for poultry bedding include sand, pine straw, or even peat moss. Peat moss has a high absorptive capacity and is naturally acidic, possibly making it a good poultry litter amendment. The objective of this study was to determine if microbial populations changed when different levels of peat moss were added to poultry litter. Experimental treatments included 0, 13 and 20% peat moss which were added to used pine shavings. A total of 216 male broilers (42 d) were separated into 18 pens (6 pens/3 treatments). Control litter samples (100 g) were collected prior to the addition of peat moss and birds (0 d); then litter samples from each pen were collected weekly thereafter for 3 wk. From each litter sample, 10 g was diluted in 90 ml of Buttersfields Phosphate and then serially diluted. For Tryptic soy agar, MacConkey agar and Sabouraud Dextrose agar, 100 μl of inoculums was plated in duplicate to detect aerobic bacteria, total coliforms and yeasts/molds, respectively. Plates were incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37°C and then counted. The results indicated that there were no differences between treatments for total aerobic bacterial counts. Initially, an increase in coliforms was detected in treatments that had peat added. By the second week coliforms were reduced in the peat treatments and a treatment by week interaction was detected (P = 0.012). The level of coliforms in litter which had peat added (13 or 20%) was 3.92 and 4.04 log cfu/g, respectively. For the control litter where no peat was added, coliforms were 5.43 log cfu/g of litter. Also a treatment by week interaction was detected for yeast and molds (P = 0.0025). Over each week of the experiment a decrease in the number of yeast and molds occurred in litter where peat was added. In week 1, yeast and molds were at 5.22 log cfu/g of litter in the control and 4.42 and 4.54 log cfu/g of litter in the 13 and 20% peat treatments, respectively. Week 2 the yeast and molds were 5.43 log cfu/g of litter in the control and 4.0 and 3.88 log cfu/g of litter for the 13 and 20% peat treatments, respectively. For, week 3 the yeast and molds were 6.03 log cfu/g of litter in the control and 4.82 and 3.72 log cfu/g of litter for the 13 and 20% peat treatments, respectively. In conclusion, the data demonstrates that the addition of peat moss may be a useful amendment for reducing bacteria, yeasts and molds in poultry litter. Overall, future studies should test the absorptive capacity of peat moss for trapping ammonia and changing the litter pH which could demonstrate how peat moss is actually reducing bacteria and yeast/mold growth in poultry litter.
PDF References Citation
How to cite this article
D.L. Everett, Y. Vizzier-Thaxton, C.D. McDaniel and A.S. Kiess, 2013. The Impact of Peat Moss Amendments on the Microbial Load in Used Pine Shaving
Poultry Litter. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12: 202-205.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2013.202.205
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2013.202.205
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2013.202.205
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2013.202.205
REFERENCES
- Arnould, C., D. Bizeray, J.M. Faure and C. Lecterrier, 2004. Effects of the addition of sand and string to pens on use of space activity tarsal angulations and bone composition in broiler chickens. Anim. Welfare, 13: 87-94.
Direct Link - Cocozza, C., V. D'Orazio, T.M. Miano and W. Shotyk, 2003. Characterization of solid and aqueous phases of a peat bog profile using molecular fluorescence spectroscopy, ESR and FT-IR and comparison with physical properties. Organic Geochem., 34: 49-60.
CrossRef - Frame, D.D., R.E. Buckner and G.L. Anderson, 2002. Pelletized newspaper bedding for Turkeys and its effect on brooding performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 11: 229-232.
Direct Link - Kline, K.L. and M.D. Coleman, 2010. Woody energy crops in the southeastern united states: Two centuries of practitioner experience. Biomass Bioenergy, 34: 1655-1666.
CrossRef - Kruglov, V.P., E.F. Mayakova and V.E. Rakovsky, 1975. Peat as a raw material for obtaining fodder and biologically active preparations. Proceedings of the 5th International Peat Congress on New Ideas and Technologies in Utilization of Peatlands and Peat, September 21-25, 1975, Poznan, Poland, pp: 54-62.
- Lovett, J., J.W. Messer and R.B. Read, 1971. The microflora of Southern Ohio poultry litter. Poult. Sci., 50: 746-751.
PubMedDirect Link - Malone, G.W., G.W. Chaloupka and W.W. Saylor, 1983. Influences of litter type and size on broiler performance. 1. Factors affecting litter consumption. Poult. Sci., 62: 1741-1746.
CrossRef - Pankratov, T.A., A.O. Ivanova, S.N. Dedysh and W. Liesack, 2011. Bacterial populations and environmental factors controlling cellulose degradation in an acidic Sphagnum peat. Environ. Microbiol., 13: 1800-1814.
CrossRef - Petherick, J.C. and I.J.H. Duncan, 1989. Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates. Br. Poult. Sci., 30: 229-238.
CrossRef - Schefferle, H.E., 1965. The microbiology of built up poultry litter. J. Applied Bacteriol., 28: 403-411.
CrossRef - Trckova, M., L. Matlova, H. Hudcova, M. Faldyna and Z. Dvorska et al., 2005. Peat as a feed supplement for animals: A review. Vet. Med. Czech, 50: 361-377.
Direct Link - Willis, W.L., C. Murray and C. Talbott, 1997. Evaluation of leaves as a litter material. Poult. Sci., 76: 1138-1140.
CrossRefDirect Link